Founded on May 8, 2018, Xoralgo builds the next generation RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks). While the cornerstone of the current RAID systems is the aging RAID 6, our RAID is based on a new algorithm utilizing five redundant disks. Our technology is called PentaRAID™.
The USPTO grated the US utility patent behind the Xoralgo technology! The U.S. patent number is 10,997,024 [Application Number 16/521,256] and it was granted by the patent office on 2021-05-04 for method and system utilizing quintuple parity to provide fault tolerance. All claims of the original application were approved!
A famous data loss study at CERN exposed data loss due to reasons other than an apparent disk failure. In particular, errors that RAID 6 cannot correct (dual bit errors). The CERN study have been confirmed by others. Before PentaRAID™ this and other problems (such as UDE) were too costly to address. Now there is a solution.
The main limitation of RAID 6 is that it uses only two redundant disks. This makes it vulnerable to data loss. One cause of data loss is a catastrophic disk failure. Another cause of data loss gaining importance today is silent data corruption due to undetected disks errors (UDE). UDE are a product of laws of physics and do occur during "normal" disk operation. In the era of huge disk drives, a UDE may occur every few hours. The IT departments often refer to UDE as " bit flip " as indeed a UDE may occur as a result of repeatedly reading a bit of data from a disk. Every 1014 reads or so, the bit will be read incorrectly, and this error may propagate in calculations (such as calculating the total of a giant spreadsheet), rendering the entire calculation invalid.
The inadequacy of RAID 6 is well-known. The failure of one disk requires its replacement and reconstruction of the data. This process may take days or weeks for the typical multi-terabyte disks of today. The RAID operating with failed disks is said to be in degraded mode. Thus, RAID systems of today spend a significant amount of time operating in degraded mode. RAID 6 in this mode can detect UDE, but cannot correct them, thus resulting in data loss.
It is not unlikely that a second disk fails during the recovery of the first failed disk. This results in doubly degraded mode. While no data loss is imminent for a RAID 6 system operating in doubly degraded mode, in this mode RAID 6 is not capable of detecting or correcting any errors. Thus, any UDE remains undetected and uncorrected by a RAID 6 operating in doubly degrated mode.
We scale up the RAID 6 architecture to use five parity blocks per stripe (P1-P5). This results in dramatic improvement of error protection (estimated 20 orders of magnitude over RAID 6). To put this number in perspective, if RAID 6 were not to lose data for 1 day (a realistic number for highly demanding AI applications, for example), PentaRAID would not lose data for more than one hundred quadrillion years! This number of course exceeds the expected life of the universe many times, but one can use the error correcting power of PentaRAID in many ways, for instance, to reduce the number of disks required to store data by a factor of 2 to 10 over the legacy systems. This will dramatically reduce the cost, and energy consumption.
PentaRAID™ is a flat RAID, i.e. no need to nest one RAID within another, which avoids many complexities of, say, RAID 60. The IT personnel familiar with RAID 6 will easily adopt to the new technology.
Well, it is not really secret, as the theory of PentaRAID™ is published in our white paper, and in the patent application soon to be published by USPTO. But, in short, we invented a new error correcting code which is used to compute the five parity blocks (P1-P5), and which has an efficient decoder. Therefore, PentaRAID™ has comparable efficiency to RAID 6, with much better data loss protection, including UDE. Also, our code is systematic, which means that non-parity blocks contain original user data, unlike original Reed-Solomon codes.
A PentaRAID™ implementation has been built to to demonstrate viability and usefulness of the technology. As an example, we built a virtual machine (utilizing Oracle's VirtualBox) with 15 virtual disks (represented by regular files) and installed the Ubuntu operating system utilizing PentaRAID™. Ubuntu partitioned the PentaRAID™ storage as usual (using the ext4 filesystem). In one of the experiments, we benchmarked the swap partition of Ubuntu, observing performance slightly under 2GB/sec. This experiment was performed on a $1,600 laptop with a quadcore processor using a single SSD disk (mSATA). The take-away is: